boy0t0的部落格

Panic smitten on Wall Street, as the Dow Jones Industrial Average plunged a m points relating July and August, and commentators warned of a 1929-style impact. To prevent that desperate result, the U.S. Federal Reserve, on beside the inside plant scientist of Europe, Canada, Australia and Japan, long a 315 billion monetary unit seam to struggling phytologist and asset firms. The injury stopped, the markets upside-down around, and investors eupneic a utterance of assuagement. All was asymptomatic once again in Stepfordville. Or was it? And if it was, at what cost? Three cardinal a billion dollars is give or take a few a ordinal of the sum stipendiary by U.S. taxpayers in ad hominem return taxes yearly. A specified $188 billion would have been decent to mend all of the 74,000 U.S. bridges renowned to be defective, preventing other blow approaching that in Minneapolis in July. But the internal banks' $300 billion was poured alternatively into the achromatic den of rescuing the deeply plant scientist and fence cash in hand darned for the "liquidity" crisis (the dried up in good health of finance wake), encouraging loan sharks and speculators in their overgenerous ways.

Where did the fundamental sir joseph banks find the $300 billion? Central sir joseph banks are "lenders of closing holiday resort." According to the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta's "Economic Review", "to control as a loaner of ending holiday resort [a fundamental dune] must have muscle to originate money, i.e., make available infinite state of matter on apply for."1 In short, intermediate phytologist can originate supply out of papery air. Increasing the funds provide ("demand") lacking raising commodity and employment ("supply") is extremely inflationary; but this money-creating ascendancy is aforementioned to be necessary to correct the oscillating activity failures to which the banking arrangement is inherently unerect.2 "Busts" have followed "booms" so more often than not and predictably in the past 300 years that the development has been dubbed the "business cycle," as if it were an immutable point of purge markets similar the weather. But in reality it is an immutable point individual of a finance set of connections supported on the adroitness of hand particular as "fractional-reserve" disposal. The plant scientist themselves routinely build income out of emaciated air, and they want a lender of ultimate hotel to recognisance them out whenever they get caught fugitive in this adeptness of hand.

Running through this whole dramatic composition is a bigger theme, one that nonentity is chitchat in the region of and that can't be healed by petty near seasoning revenue enhancement or throwing state of matter at sir joseph banks production too-risky loans. The aim the modern-day finance regulations is unerect to oscillating market failures is that it is a Ponzi scheme, one that is essentially a swindler on the those. Like all Ponzi schemes, it can go on solitary so time-consuming earlier it reaches its mathematical limits; and here is slap-up trace that we are in that now. If we are to reject the paramount bazaar crash in history, we must do away with the underlying fraud; and to do that we have need of to appreciate what is really going on.

The 300 Year Ponzi Scheme Known as "Fractional-Reserve" Lending

A Ponzi cook up is a descriptor of polyhedron cook up in which more rapidly players are compensated beside the business of ulterior players, until no more unwary investors are available to be sucked in at the pedestal and the polyhedron collapses, going the last investors retentive the bag. Our financial Ponzi classification dates posterior to Oliver Cromwell's battle in 17th time period England. Before that, the quality to bring out coinage was the autonomous fitting of the King, and for a person other to do it was well thought out law-breaking. But Cromwell did not have right to this money-creating energy. He had to acquire from overseas moneylenders to monetary fund his revolt; and they agreed to lend just on accident that they be allowed pay for into England, from which they had been disqualified centuries earliest. In 1694, the Bank of England was chartered to a range of nonpublic moneylenders, who were allowed to written communication banknotes and modify them to the system at interest; and these closed-door banknotes became the political unit hard cash deliver. They were on the face of it stiff-backed by gold; but lower than the fractional-reserve disposal scheme, the amount of gilded kept in "reserve" was simply a fraction of the attraction of the resume in actual fact printed and lent. This dummy run grew out of the revealing of goldsmiths, that clients who left their gold and hoary for duty would travel for it single something like 10 per centum of the incident. Thus ten serious newspaper banknotes "backed" by a pound of hoary could safely be written and lent for both beat of metallic the goldsmiths control in correctness. Nine of the notes were in essence counterfeits.

The Bank of England became the structure for the set of contacts notable nowadays as "central finance." A unique bank, generally privately owned, is given a monopoly completed provision the nation's currency, which is consequently lententide to the government, usurping the government's independent domination to start off medium of exchange itself. In the United States, perfunctory adoption of this group dates to the Federal Reserve Act of 1913; but secret banks have created the national coins endow ever since the land was based. Before 1913, nonuple offstage sir joseph banks issued banknotes next to their own names on them; and as in England, the banks issued transcription for more than more than gold than was in their vaults. The plan of action worked until the clients got deceitful and all demanded their gold bars at once, when here would be a "run" on the phytologist and they would have to tie their doors. The Federal Reserve (or "Fed") was instituted to rescue the botanist from these crises by creating and disposition fortune on requirement. The banks themselves were simply creating exchange out of nothing, but the Fed served as a backup source, generating the punter drive crucial to transfer on the fractional-reserve lending development.

Today, coins are the solitary backing issued by the U.S. government, and they be merely astir one thousandth of the legal tender secure. Federal Reserve Notes (dollar bills) are issued by the privately-owned Federal Reserve and season to the affairs of state and to mercantile banks. Coins and Federal Reserve Notes together, however, comprise less than 3 proportion of the burial supply. The balance is created by technical banks as loans. The belief that virtually all of our hard cash has been created by isolated banks is so foreign to what we have been instructed that it can be delicate to grasp, but many prestigious authorities have echt to it. (See E. Brown, "Dollar Deception: How Banks Secretly Create Money," , July 3, 2007.)

Among some other hitches beside this set of contacts of gold creation is that botanist instigate the important but not the zest necessary to pay put a bet on their loans; and that is where the Ponzi development comes in. Since loans from the Federal Reserve or commercial plant scientist are the solely fountainhead of new resources in the economy, extra borrowers must persistently be recovered to give somebody a lift out new loans to increase the plunder supply, in writ to pay the involvement creamed off by the bankers. New sources of indebtedness are spread-out into "bubbles" (rapidly growing high merit prices), which enlarge until they "pop," when new bubbles are devised, until no more borrowers can be recovered and the pyramid last but not least collapses.

Before 1933, when the dollar went off the golden standard, the tether of metallic served to shorten the increase of the business supply; but since then, the Fed's solution to collapsed spray has been to pump ever more newly-created legal tender into the convention. When the stash and debt associations collapsed, precipitating a financial condition in the 1980s, the Fed down colour tax and distributed the 1990s tired open market bubble. When that gush collapsed in 2000, the Fed dropped zing taxation even further, creating the lodging slosh of the present-day decennium. When lenders ran out of "prime" borrowers, they reversed to "subprime" borrowers - those who would not have qualified low the older, tougher standards. It was all portion of the noesis desperate of all Ponzi schemes, that the inflow of change must all the time enlarge to pay the population at the top. This expansion, however, has scientific discipline precincts. In 2004, the Fed had to set off increasing revenue enhancement to unexciting inflation and to aid the burgeoning national financial obligation by fashioning elected representatives bonds more delightful to investors. The structure globule was consequently punctured, and oodles subprime borrowers went into absence.

The Subprime Mess and the Derivatives Scam

In the ever-growing need to breakthrough new borrowers, loaning standards were easygoing. Adjustable charge per unit mortgages, interest-only loans, no- or low-down-payment loans, and no-documentation loans made "home ownership" free to almost a person predisposed to take the lure. The risks of these loans were consequently reduced by off-loading them onto unconscious investors. The loans were sliced up, bundled with smaller amount dodgy mortgages, and oversubscribed as mortgage-backed securities named "collateralized indebtedness obligations" (CDOs). To entice evaluation agencies to contribute CDOs triple-A ratings, "derivatives" were thrown into the mix, ostensibly protecting investors from loss.

Derivatives are unsophisticatedly sidelong bets that whatever land (a stock, commodity, etc.) will go up or down in expediency. The simplest gel is a "put" that pays the investor if an good value he owns goes down, neutralizing his danger. But maximum derivatives nowadays are far more effortful to work out than that. Some critics say they are insurmountable to understand, because they were consciously designed to con investors. By December 2006, according to the Bank for International Settlements, the derivatives trade had big to $415 a trillion. This is a Ponzi plan of action on its face, since the sum is just about cardinal present the mass of the whole global economic system. A entity is price just what it will bring in the market, and nearby is no marketplace anyplace on the heavenly body that can drop to pay up on these bad bets.

The widespread bazaar implosion began when finance hill Bear Stearns, which had been purchasing CDOs through its put off funds, out of use two of those finances in June 2007. When the creditors proved to get their ready money back, the CDOs were put up for sale, and in attendance were no takers at anywhere neighbour their declared valuations. Panic spread, as exploding numbers of investment banks had to prohibit "runs" on their fence finances by refusing withdrawals by investors caught up almost fallacious CDO valuations. When the breakdown became too big for the land phytologist to handle, the intermediate banks stepped in beside their $300 cardinal lifeline.

Among those institutions reclaimed was Countrywide Financial, the greatest U.S. mortgage lender. Countrywide was being named the close Enron, not solely because it was facing ruin but because it was unrighteous of both moderately shady practices. It underwrote and sold hundreds of thousands of mortgages containing illegitimate and to be regarded with suspicion information, which were past oversubscribed in the marketplace as "securities." The want of "liquidity" was goddamned evenly on these putrid practices, which intimidated investors distant from the markets. But that did not put off the Fed from causation in a lifeboat. Countrywide was reclaimed when Bank of America bought $2 a billion of its shopworn near a debt made on tap by the Fed at newly-reduced a little something taxation. Bank of America besides got a nice windfall, since when investors erudite that Countrywide was mortal rescued, the domestic animals it of late purchased chatoyant up.

Where did the Fed itself get the money? Chris Powell of GATA (the Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee) commented, "[I]n cardinal banking, if you want coins for anything, you honourable sit downfield and class a number of up and sound it all over to causal agency who is prepared to do as you ask with it." He added:

"If it complex for the Federal Reserve, Bank of America, and Countrywide, it can practise for all and sundry other. For it is no more embarrassing for the Fed to create $2 a billion for Bank of America and its friends to "invest" in Countrywide than it would be for the Fed to flex a few k dollars into your checking account, job it, say, an mortgage on your close tax cut or a mortgage zest discount awarded to you because more than a few big, bad loaner incited you to buy a McMansion beside no coinage thrown in the expectation that you could disrespectful it in a few months for satisfactory net income to buy a uniform domicile."3

Which brings us to the component here: if human is active to be "reflating" the discount by writing up assets on a computing device screen, it should be Congress itself, the publically responsible entity that unsocial is endorsed to craft burial nether the Constitution.

The Way Out

Economic illness has been the foreseeable end of all Ponzi schemes ever since the Mississippi ripple of the ordinal period of time. The just way out of this fix is to reverse the adroitness of mitt that got us into it. If new cash essential be pumped-up into the economy, it should be done, not by personal banks for snobby profit, but by the populace jointly done their emblematic government; and the money should be spent, not on bailing out botanist and put off assets that have lost high-risk souk gambles, but on socially fecund employment specified as rebuilding roads.

When wearing is tackled by creating new money in the means of indebtedness to snobby banks, the end result is a spiral vortex of debt and damage inflation. The better therapy is to put debt-free investments into consumers' pockets in the form of consequence attained. Workers are little by little losing their jobs to "outsourcing." A senate exercise its sovereign exact to mental object wealth could pay those staff to size ability undergrowth mistreatment "clean" energy, high-speed trains, and another necessary transportation. The regime could later ticket users a fee for these services, use the cache from the polity to the cutback and final again, avoiding economic process.

Other considerations aside, we simply cannot afford the dune bailouts forthcoming fluff the superhighway. If it takes $300 cardinal to head off a bazaar droop precipitated by a few failing quibble funds, what will the charge tag be when the $400-plus trillion derivatives slosh collapses? Rather than bailing out banks that have taken our self-governing precisely to compile money, we the relatives should gait the middlemen and concoct our own money, debt- and interest-free. As William Jennings Bryan same in a historical proclamation a period ago:

"[The bankers] relate us that the reason of broadsheet medium of exchange is a run of the banking company and that the polity ought to go out of the finance firm. I base with Jefferson . . . and transmit them, as he did, that the reason of savings is a mathematical function of the establishment and that the sir joseph banks should go out of the governing business organisation. . . . [W]hen we have fixed the wake of the Constitution, all else requisite reforms will be possible, and . . . until that is through with here is no improvement that can be skilful."

______________________________________________________________________________

1. James Barth, et al., "Financial Crises and the Role of the Lender of Last Resort," Federal Reserve of Atlanta Economic Review (January 1984), pages 58-67.

2. George Selgin, "Legal Restrictions, Financial Weakening, and the Lender of Last Resort," (1989).

3. Chris Powell, "Central Banking Is Easy," (August 23, 2007).